|
|
Flow-Accelerated Corrosion
By Marvin D. Silbert, Marvin Silbert and
Associates
From The Analyst, Fall 2002
Abstract Most cooling and boiler systems are
constructed of carbon steel, a material that is very prone to corrosion
when it comes into contact with water. While the water-treatment industry
has developed many products to retard that corrosion, it is important to
recognize that boilers and cooling systems are very dynamic. The success
or failure of any chemical treatment program is highly dependent upon the
balance between two opposing processes: a chemical treatment program that
forms a stable protective surface, and a flow that is continuously trying
to remove it. This article shows some examples that demonstrate the role
of flow with respect to corrosion in cooling and boiler systems.
Introduction For years, the metals that form
the pipe work, tubes, shells and other components of cooling systems and
boilers were chosen on the basis of cost-effectiveness, mechanical
strength and heat-transfer characteristics. Water chemistry was rarely
considered until it suddenly came into play when that first drop of water
was added to the system. It must be remembered that these metals started
as oxides or sulfides dug from the ground. A large input of energy was
needed to convert them into the metallic form. Once they come into contact
with water, they are going to find ways to revert back to their natural
state. Depending upon the type of system, they may be attacked by
dissolved oxygen, galvanic action or microbiological activity either
individually or in combination.
There are two practical and workable routes.
A. Anodic inhibition - Prevents metallic ions from entering the water
under a very specific set of conditions by forming a highly protective
oxide surface.
B. Cathodic inhibition - Blocks the corrosion process by depositing a
protective film that isolates the metal surface from its surroundings.
In neither case is the protective layer either fixed or permanent. The
flowing water is constantly trying to dissolve or erode that surface and
the higher the velocity, the more effective the removal of the protective
layer. Thermal stresses form cracks that allow water to seep under the
deposit where impurities can concentrate. Multiple cracks grow together
and cause large chunks to break away and be transported with the flow.
Over time, the damage may be sufficient to expose bare metal. Wherever it
does, corrosion is likely to occur. The ability of any chemical treatment
program to protect the base metal becomes a chemical balancing act between
the flow trying to remove the coating and the treatment trying to reform
or repair it. If it can be repaired as fast as it is being removed, the
surface will be protected. If it cannot, the protection will be lost and
the metal will corrode. As the corrosion process requires that flow, it is
known as Flow-Accelerated Corrosion or Flow-Assisted Corrosion. The
acronym FAC is appropriate for either. As the loss can also be considered
a combination of mechanical wear or erosion, followed by chemical attack
or corrosion of the freshly exposed surface, it is also known as
Erosion-Corrosion.

Perhaps the best-known example of FAC occurs in domestic hot-water
systems for large buildings. Water is distributed using copper pipes and
tubing to the individual users from a hot-water heater in the basement or
sub-basement. The individuals who use that water do not care that their
office or apartment on the 50th floor may be a few hundred metres further
from that boiler than one on the 1st floor. They want hot water whenever
they turn on the tap. Rather than supply the taps directly from the
boiler, these buildings employ a recirculating hot-water loop with roughly
the same distance between the loop and the hot water taps in any office or
apartment on any floor. While various jurisdictions may prohibit chemical
treatment in potable water systems, this does not present any problem as
the dissolved oxygen in the water reacts with the copper metal to form an
oxide layer that protects the metal as long as the flow velocity in the
loop is below three feet per second. What happens when either the design
or a valving error allows it to go higher? The oxide gets worn away to
expose bare copper metal. As oxygenated water continues to pass over that
active surface, a new layer of oxide forms on the bare spots, only to be
worn away again. This cycle repeats itself until there is essentially no
wall thickness left and the pipe fails. As most of the piping for the
recirculation line is hidden behind walls, the failure first appears as
water damage to walls or carpets. By this point, it is too late to do
anything but replace major pipe sections. The repairs can be quite
expensive, especially when walls must be knocked down to allow access to
the pipes.
Cross
Section of Copper Riser from Recirculating Hot-water System. This pipe was
removed when the system failed due to FAC. The photographs show the extent
of the wall thinning. Magnification is 10x for the upper view and 60x for
lower view.
Boiler Water Treatment
FAC is well known in boiler feedwater systems. Most
boiler treatment programs are based upon a high-quality treated feedwater
with an oxygen scavenger added to keep the oxygen below 10 mg/L and a
volatile amine to raise the pH. When the feed train is made from ferrous
metals, a pH of 9.5-9.8 will effectively minimize corrosion in carbon
steel. In a well controlled system, the low oxygen and high pH result in
the formation of a stable and protective magnetite (Fe3O4) layer on the
carbon steel surfaces and a circulating iron concentration below 10 mg/L.
While magnetite is considered as insoluble, it does have a very small
solubility that is dependent upon both temperature and pH. This means
there will be regions where the magnetite is more soluble than others. As
the boiler feedwater moves up the cycle, magnetite will move from those
regions where it is most soluble to those where it is least soluble. When
copper alloys are present, that pH range must be reduced to 8.8-9.2 to
prevent attack on the copper. Unfortunately, this makes those differences
in solubility much greater. For many years, it was common to design the
feedwater trains for the high-pressure boilers used for electrical
generation with Admiralty Brass condenser tubes, Admiralty Brass or carbon
steel low pressure (LP) feed heater tubes, and carbon steel high pressure
(HP) feed heater tubes. This combination may have had good
thermal-transfer properties and kept the price down, but it was also a
guarantee that the HP feed heater tubes would suffer thinning from FAC as
the magnetite moved from the HP feed heater and deposited on the boiler
tubes. Most tube failures tend to occur when the full output of the unit
is badly needed. The quickest action is to take the unit down, locate the
failed tubes, plug them and get the unit back online as quickly as
possible. To continue operating with the same output, that same flow will
now have to go through fewer tubes. This means that the flow velocity will
be higher to compensate and that will accelerate the time to the next
failure. Eventually, it will become necessary to retube the heat
exchanger. The choice should be a more resistant alloy such as a stainless
steel for the tubes and, if at all possible, eliminate all the copper
alloys in the system.
Solubility of Magnetite in Ammoniated Water vs. Temperature and pH
By superimposing the approximate temperatures for the various feedwater
components, it can be seen that the maximum solubility lies within the HP
feedwater heaters. The effect is much more pronounced in the lower pH
range required when copper alloys are present within the system. (This
graph has been adapted from data supplied to the author by F. Pocock,
Babcock & Wilcox.)
FAC can also be a serious problem in a steam system. As the steam gives
up energy to heat plant components or turn a turbine, water droplets start
to condense and impinge upon the pipe walls. The choice of amine is
important. Ammonia tends to stay with the steam. This leaves the liquid
phase with insufficient protection to maintain a stable magnetite surface.
Morpholine will perform better as it distributes itself into both the
steam and liquid phases. This allows the droplets to carry some protection
and help maintain the magnetite surfaces.
Comparison of Ammonia and Morpholine as Alkalizing Amines from
0-300°C A. The upper figure compares their base strengths. As pKb is a
negative logarithmic term, a lower value indicates increasing base
strength. The curves show ammonia as the stronger base at lower
temperatures with a crossover just above 200°C. Above this morpholine
becomes the stronger base. B. The lower curve shows their distribution
between the steam and liquid phases. Ammonia favour the steam phase at all
temperatures. Morpholine strongly favours the liquid phase below 100°C and
keeps a reasonable proportion in the liquid phase.
(This curve has
been plotted using the data of J.W. Cobble and P.J. Turner, "Additives for
pH Control in PWR Secondary Water", EPRI NP-4209, Interim Report, August
1988. This report details the base strengths and distribution ratios for
seventy-nine candidate amines for pH control.)
Cooling Water Treatment FAC plays an
important role in cooling water treatment, but is rarely discussed in this
context. All-organic treatment programs protect carbon steel by laying
down a protective film. At the same time, the flowing water that passes
across that film tries to remove it. If a treatment program is going to
succeed, a stable, uniform and adherent film must cover the entire
surface. Laboratory testing and field trials during the development of a
particular product establish the ideal dosage for a number of standard
applications. Whether or not it is said, the reason for that choice is the
balance between formation of that protective film and its removal. If the
dosage is set lower, the film may be removed. If it is set higher, the
application cost ceases to be competitive. Most water treatment programs
include a recommendation for a start-up dosage that is double for normal
operation. There is a reason for this approach. It can take several weeks
to build up a stable and adherent layer and, until it is formed, the
balance can quickly tip to let the flow damage or even remove the film.
Doubling the dosage accelerates the growth of the film to obtain that
balance point. Once the protective film is formed, it becomes imperative
that the product dosage be tightly controlled. In one side-by-side
comparison, plants "A" and "B" used the same treatment program. Plant A
had an automatic feed system. Plant B was manually controlled and lack of
attention would allow the dosage to creep down, then up, then drift again.
In spite of the fact that both plants averaged the same total dosage over
the year, corrosion rates were very low for A and quite high for B. If the
addition rates fluctuate, the film can be extensively damaged when the
addition rate is too low for extended periods. An extended period of time
had to occur to develop the initial film when the program was introduced.
A similar length of time will be needed for a major rebuild as compared to
performing a simple patch. Will the dosage be the
same at all plants? If the flow rates are particularly high, it may be
necessary to increase the dosage. If they are particularly low, it may be
possible to reduce it. Many plant operators complain that water treatment
companies always increase their dosage whenever problems arise and hint
that this may be a means to increase revenue. That increase is more likely
related to the presence of high flow rates and/or turbulence within the
system. These flow rates need not be high throughout the entire system. If
there is a higher velocity in one section, the overall treatment must be
based upon that one section.
Formulations for System Cleanup Depending upon the
conditions within any steel system, circulating iron is either going to
form a protective surface or be transported through the system in a
particulate form until it settles in a low flow region, bakes unto a
particularly hot surface or is trapped by a filter. As too few systems are
equipped with filters, it is more likely to be some combination of the
first two scenarios. All chemical treatment programs endeavour to minimize
corrosion of the carbon steel and maintain a clean system. Even the best
of programs can be overwhelmed and fail when corrosion products enter the
system from other locations. It may come from a leaking process heat
exchanger, cooling sprays or a long length of pipe work. It is common to
modify the formulation to cope with this material by adding agents to
clean up the iron or at least keep it in suspension until it can be
removed by filtration. The most common ingredients to undertake this
endeavour are chelants such as EDTA or NTA. The problem is that these
materials cannot distinguish between particulate iron laid down as a
protective deposit and corrosion products brought into the system by
corrosion at the far reaches of a heating or cooling network. If they
clean up an unwanted deposit, success has been achieved. If they clean up
some of the protective oxide from the surface, that can be detrimental,
especially if they reach bare metal with traces of oxygen in the water. A
new layer of oxide will form. With higher temperatures and flows involved,
the extent of this FAC damage can be particularly damaging in a boiler
system. It is very important to realize that the "C" words are fully
interchangeable between the terms on-power cleaning and on-power
corrosion.
Conclusion FAC should be considered at the design
stage, during operation, and as part of any troubleshooting activity.
There is good news on the design end with the newer combined cycle and
large electrical generating stations eliminating copper alloys and
switching to stainless steel feed heater and condenser tubes. However,
there needs to be more emphasis on the potential for FAC in boiler and
cooling systems, both at the proposal phase, and during troubleshooting.
About the
Author Marvin Silbert is President of Silbert and
Associates in Toronto, Canada. He can be reached at (416) 225-4541.
|